SMOKED GERMAN PROFESSOR ALBAYAY
Chief Race Pedagogy in Physics, Professor
PUCV Liceo Jose Cortes Brown
educator and Master Degree in Physics
Education Sciences
what is your opinion and to create that new legislation should allow engineers to conduct classes in high schools?
"According to a study conducted in 2003 by Francis Light, a professor at PUC, reveals that there is a shortage of science teachers : a cumulative deficil a physics teachers 20%, 14% chemistry and biology teachers surplus of 20%. Therefore, what occurs in the educational system is that many profs are not physical, for example, and who are taking the subject of physics. These can be profes profes biology, mathematics and some construction engineers that are enabled by the educational system, to solve the educational problem. This becomes much more difficult in rural areas where there are no engineers. There are many profs who do physics, but are profes musical science or social studies, science and contains the name of its title, the director decides to make physics classes.
Then comes the LGE to solve in the worst way possible, treating the underlying problem: encourage the formation of profes science and particularly physics, providing scholarships, promoting higher wages, which would motivate people to study. The LGE instead of taking this path, which makes implementing a system that consolidates something that is already being done, because the profs rating already exists. The enactment in the LGE will allow other allied professionals can do classes. For example, the degree is so far as the engineer of pedagogical training. The application of this law is a bad sign of how the problems facing the country. Among the teachers the question is will the physics teacher can build a bridge or can operate at a person trying to highlight the importance of the doctor or engineer? Unfortunately society has not dignified the teacher, so now anyone think of education and politicians have given a bad signal for the misuse of democracy, because here were all ears unless the guild who has the expertiz to discuss education .
I have no doubt that an engineer is not a good engineer, I doubt that an engineer is a good teacher, because doing pedagogy do not pass classes and materials. Normally, the teaching system is behaviorist Ues and outdated, focused on the teacher to teach content, when the paradigm of education today is constructivism, which aims to give processes that college is not taking place. Then the engineer will tend to replicate the system that was formed to "take down and move materials." I have no doubt they have good engineers who have a vocation, theme that a teacher is not a good teacher by vocation, but an education professional . Not enough to have desire but manage concepts. "
do you think that this will affect the work environment and education in high school because of the new relationship between teachers and engineers?
" I do not think because the guild as a profes We work with people-adapted to the situations that occur in educational communities. The issues is when facing academic or pedagogical in discussions. What will be the benchmark under which the person is not sitting in front of teacher is going to these types of technical and pedagogical conditions that influence the development of the community. The physics teacher is able to look beyond the contents, the engineer despite having a good attitude towards education, it has the elements of knowledge to address the psychology of teenage , development of skills, emotional issue. The methodological issues will be going to influence the didactic. At the country level will lead to fewer people have the motivation to study physics. For example an engineer who wants to physics, should be 3 years so that it can enable, then 2 years so you can keep at it and 5 years can do a course in pedagogy, I wonder why not party making pedagogy courses?.
In this respect, the people who approved the LGE in these conditions have made a mistake that will influence the future. I bring up what happened in 1981 under Decree 300, which was elective physics, which appeared between 3 ° and 4 ° midway between a group of other asiganturas electives such as weaving and manicure. He spent a lot of high school lived without the knowledge of physics, who lost the opportunity to develop scientific line of physics. A whole generation had access to this way of seeing the world. Today is going to generate the same consequences.
The engineer has a more pragmatic, but the physical is not pragmatic, it has to do with dreams, do crazy things, like the experiment alla in europe trying to do lab work to smash particles to see what happens and as the universe begins. So that kind of thinking is what the professional from the discipline contains, pedagogical, understanding the psychological processes of students, a specialist in another area does not have. And this is the opinion of all teachers "
PATRIOT STUDENT UNION VALP
0 comments:
Post a Comment